"Since it hasn't been a year since it was released, it has not been possible for many kids to purchase it, but for now it is a game with a consumer set that's probably different from the expectations," he explained.

I will go a little off here, and wonder when this threw them for a major loop. Would they prefer that this was primarily appreciated by children? Kids (can be) more accommodating and they certainly have a much smaller voice in regards to feedback.

Fundamentally, will they attempt to appease their elderly audience (who showed up in droves) or even attempt to change to game to make it less appealing to adults and more (or just ) attractive to kids?

For me it's not even that, it's that the second onwards profiles have restricted abilities. This fuckin blows and stop me from becoming the match. Otherwise I would've loved to share an island with my husband.

It's not ideal, but it really doesn't hamstring you like you think/people say.

Personally, I enjoy sharing the island with my wife and daughter. I definitely understand wanting one to yourself as well. As always, more options and flexibility are always better.

Yeah, if both players were equal owners and may"progress" the island equally, it would be OK. I've got it and my daughter is the island proprietor so there is really nothing I could do unless she goes and does exactly the quests.

And he is tackling a specific point made in the article. Does he have to discuss every single topic before making a comment?

This is obviously not a sport designed toward the majority of people on this sub. I do not really understand all of the hating given many folks here either didn't play with the previous ones or obviously are interested in a game that is not Animal Crossing.

If you want to buy it, you can access https://www.acbells.com/